Subject: Re: Merging and Quines From: Tom Mullen <Tom.Mullen@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:16:49 +0000 (GMT) |
Oliver, >Using Xalan on an 800 node xml file (example node below) I get the >following timings for versions 1.2 & 1.3 of your merge xslt: > >V1.2 1688618 millisecs >V1.3 1639537 millisecs > >(both ~30 mins) > Humblest apologies, I feel I may have been doing you a disservice (albeit with the help of "XALAN Version 1.1D01 XML4J Version Xerces 1.1.1"). I had a suspicion that XALAN was greedy with memory for the key() solution so switched to saxon to try it out. I was initially annoyed because I thought Saxon had crashed without issuing an error message, until I noticed that it had actually completed succesfully. I revisited your merge stylesheets with the 800 node example and found that Saxon executed it within a matter of some 30 seconds (an improvement on 30mins!). Needless to say, I've now switched to Saxon. Apologies once again, Tom Mullen ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Merging and Quines, Tom Mullen | Thread | Re: Merging and Quines, Oliver Becker |
Re: AW: matching nodes by their val, Oliver Becker | Date | Re: Understanding xsl:key, Jeni Tennison |
Month |