Subject: Re: "replies go to the list" policy From: v.rudowitsch@xxxxxx Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:45:24 +0100 |
One note about this text. : Reasonable mail programs have two separate ``reply'' commands: This means: If you, fool, have an unreasonable mail program, your opinion is uninteresting for clever mail-list readers. Would be the change in "replays... policy" a reasonable ground for management of firm I work for to replace standard software? Regards! Vit Oliver Becker <obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> am 16.08.2000 16:01:40 Bitte antworten an xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Kopie: xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Blindkopie: Vitali Rudowitsch/Consulting/Software Engineering GmbH/DE) Thema: Re: "replies go to the list" policy > Please ignore my previous posting, I've been tricked by the infamous > "replies go to the list" policy. > > Am I the only one here to think that this policy brings more annoyances than > benefits and should be changed? Once upon a time I considered such a policy comfortable and useful. Until I read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Regards, Oliver /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: "replies go to the list" policy, FINLEY, Mike | Thread | RE: "replies go to the list" policy, ogerardin . cs |
Understanding xsl:key, Heiner de Wendt | Date | Indexing Tree Elements (repost), Lee Goddard |
Month |