Subject: RE: Best XSLT processor? From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:12:32 +0200 |
First read this FAQ http://www.netcrucible.com/xslt/msxml-faq.htm to understand the issues with MSXML (the processor you're using). Different versions of it are going around and one of them doesn't implement XSLT, but a very outdated version of XSL. If you want to switch to another processor I'd suggest SAXON. Very very compliant. Linda > -----Original Message----- > From: Heiner de Wendt [mailto:H.dewendt@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 8:26 AM > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Best XSLT processor? > > > Hello, > > I'm working with XMLSpy editor, which has no built-in XSLT processor. > Currently, I'm using the MS processor, as is the default setting. My > question: Is there any 'better' one out there that I could use with > XMLSpy? Are there any known problems with the MS XSLT processor? > > Thanks, > > Heiner > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Best XSLT processor?, Heiner de Wendt | Thread | RE: Best XSLT processor?, Eckenberger Axel |
RE: XSL and blank textarea, Ben Robb | Date | RE: How dynamic is XSL?, Linda van den Brink |
Month |