Subject: RE: key(). ( Re: Saxon VS XT ) From: Ben Robb <Ben@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:58:21 +0100 |
> I find it interesting that in order to avoid using a standard > function in a tool, you want Sebastian to use another tool > which requires a full database underneath to function... I think that the point Paul was trying to make was that although XML is a very useful technology for data transfer/ display, storing GBs of data in a flat file is a backwards step which will almost certainly never outperform enterprise level relational database servers... They have, after all, had a good 30 years lead time on us *grin* Ben XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: key(). ( Re: Saxon VS XT ), Thorbjørn Ravn Ander | Thread | RE: key(). ( Re: Saxon VS XT ), Kay Michael |
RE: key() Re: Saxon VS XT, Thorbjørn Ravn Ander | Date | RE: Bug in 'xsl:sort'. ( XT vs SAXO, Kay Michael |
Month |