Subject: Re: Saxon VS XT From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:47:02 +0100 (BST) |
Paul Tchistopolskii writes: > Not implementing key() is almost not a limitation. > Most of developers will never ever use key() > because they'll never ever understand how to use > this function. For good or bad, key() is well explained in several important documentation sources, such as Kay's book, the CraneSoftwrights book, and the FAQ. Possibly you'd like to visit the FAQ, find the answers which mention key(), and explain how to do it using XT? Developers will use what the documentation tells them to use. If all the books have solutions to common problems based on key(), it will be understood. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Saxon VS XT, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: Saxon VS XT, Manuel Montoro |
RE: number format test, Kay Michael | Date | RE: SAXON 5.4 bug in boolean cast t, Jeni Tennison |
Month |