Subject: RE: SAXON : function extensibility problem From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:11:44 +0100 |
> Now from the saxon documentation I can read : "If there are > several methods in the class that match the localname, the first one with the > correct number of arguments is used. There is no attempt to match the type of the > arguments." You're right, and if I had known at the time that different Java VMs could return the methods in different orders I wouldn't have done it like this. I shall now leave it as it is until we get an official standard for external Java function binding. It's no secret that this is on the W3C agenda. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
SAXON : function extensibility prob, Frédéric Bages | Thread | can one pass a parameter when openi, Eric Taylor |
RE: Evaluate a string to a node set, Kay Michael | Date | RE: XSL Sort and Xalan, Kay Michael |
Month |