Subject: RE: MSXML Whitespace handling From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gaspar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:12:56 +0200 |
> I do think your/Mikes finer points should be taken to W3C, but for your > customers, the choice should be compliance with their expectations. Completelly agree! "compliance with their expectations" looks like the key expression for me. No complains about MSXML architecture. I just believe that the default value for the "DOMDocument.preserveWhiteSpace" property should be TRUE instead of FALSE. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Pawson, David > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 10:30 > To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: MSXML Whitespace handling > > I think this provides the focus Andrew. Nearer to 98% of users > of MSXML will not appreciate the finer points of document load options, > simply using a tool that MS provides. > We are repeatedly told that space is preserved within xsl:text elements. > We use it like that and expect certain outcomes. > I do think your/Mikes finer points should be taken to W3C, but for your > customers, the choice should be compliance with their expectations. > > Regards DaveP > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: MSXML Whitespace handling, Pawson, David | Thread | RE: MSXML Whitespace handling, Kay Michael |
Including files into a stylesheet, Joe Plant | Date | Help : Problem with CDATA section, Masaoud T. Moonim |
Month |