Subject: RE: FO From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 15:56:49 -0700 |
>1. XSL-FO is still a working draft. They specifically tell you that they >will not be constrained by implementations when making changes. It is >also this changing specification that drives the development of FOP so, >as soon as it's possible after a new draft is out, they update FOP to >comply with the new draft... and that will not change until XSL-FO >becomes a standard.
And...? XSLT is also still a working draft (Or a recommendation - I forget the difference).
Yet I would consider XSLT to have an amount of stability (Within reason). This doesn't answer my question. Secondly, FOP is only compatible with the old working draft, far as I know.
-Chris -- Christopher R. Maden, Senior XML Analyst, Lexica LLC 222 Kearny St., Ste. 202, San Francisco, CA 94108-4510 +1.415.901.3631 tel./+1.415.477.3619 fax <URL:http://www.lexica.net/> <URL:http://www.oreilly.com/%7Ecrism/>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: FO, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: FO, Matthew Bentley |
RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: retrieving a piece of data from, Jeni Tennison |
Month |