Subject: RE: running msxml3 from command line From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 22:56:22 +0100 (BST) |
Andrew Kimball writes: > You're right, my interpretation was wrong. I'm glad this came up. I'll fix > this for the next release. > > ~Andy Kimball > MSXSL Dev It would be excellent if you were to publish your current bug list, and a current list of features waiting to be implemented. any chance of that? does corporate policy allow it? MSXML is now so close to completion that I at least am unclear what *is* missing (apart from unparsed-entity-uri); what do *you* know is broken? Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: running msxml3 from command lin, Andrew Kimball | Thread | RE: running msxml3 from command lin, Andrew Kimball |
Re: portability. (Re: microsoft lat, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | node-set() function in MSXML?, Evan Lenz |
Month |