Subject: RE: Accessing a node name from within <xsl:attribute> From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:24:37 +0100 |
Paul Tchistopolskii >b. You are realy novice who thinks that "MS IE has XSL". >In this case you should immediatly do what Michael >suggests you to do! ( I mean you should separate >hype from reality and install the second XSLT engine >today ;-) It could be Xt or SAXON ;-) After my experience this week I'd suggest Saxon. Reason? James product takes a Unix approach, if you don't know what you're doing, don't use it. James appears to have taken the 'relaxed' option to error reporting, fully compliant with the spec I'm sure, but still 'relaxed' (silent reporting I think was the phrase) Mike has taken a 'harder' approach and reports errors where they are found. (e.g. variable in match pattern caught me out) I used xalan the other day for the first time, and it reported two templates which had equal priority (something I hadn't noticed). IMHO, any new user wants as much error reporting support as possible. Hence I think I'll start to favour saxon in future, even though I rarely need the additional features that saxon provides over xt. My only real preference for xt over saxon is that is shorter to type<grin/> Another tuppence worth :-) Regards, DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
microsoft are good guys, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Accessing a node name from with, Paul Tchistopolskii |
criticism of MSXML (was Re: asp ass, Mike Brown | Date | Re: Accessing a node name from with, Nikolai Grigoriev |
Month |