Subject: Re: Netscape Support for XSL - client vs server rant From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:09:15 -0400 |
Dan Morrison wrote: > > I'll go out on a limb here, and (to mix my metaphors) will probably be > shot down in flames, but it could be said that the concentration we see > on server-based solutions is not just making up for the dodgy support > currently available in client browsers, but actually reactionary against > the fact that the MS integrated model is actually a Good Thing [TM] and > some folk are loathe to admit it. Quite possibly. Of course, I would say that. The problem for me is not just browser lock-in, but OS lock-in - I'm not ready to let go of my sexy turquoise SGI box just yet. You might be able to persuade people to upgrade or even change their browser, but changing hardware is a little tricker. I, for one, will wait for a Netscape/Mozilla that provides a stable XML/XSL client implentation and is available on all 15-odd platforms before I even consider moving XML off the server. You can't seriously be sending Email at 2am on a Saturday morning? -- Warren Hedley XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Wider Content Management issues (wa, Dan Morrison | Thread | Re: Netscape Support for XSL - clie, Dan Morrison |
AVT's in xslt_processor:output doct, Warren Hedley | Date | Re: XSL outputting HTML from an XML, Warren Hedley |
Month |