Subject: Re: lists as parameters From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 12:07:33 +0200 |
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Is there someway to pass list/collections as parameters? Here's what I would >like to do, but this isn't allowed.... Thats known as matching on "result tree fragments" and is explicitly forbidden in the current draft. Basically the argument against it was that it introduces multi-pass capabilities into XSL, and reduces the ability to do incremental implementations. Personally I don't find this very convincing - string processing gives raise to the same problems as result tree matching. >I tried to achieve this with the string functions but I couldn't come up >with a scheme to handle a variable number of items. It should be possible, though. I've posted a few months back an XSL program which solves the n-queens problem by abusing the string operations - if you look it up you could probably get some ideas on how to achieve what you need. I'd be wary of actually using such code in a real system, though. I'd prefer to chain two XSLT stylesheets instead. Share & Enjoy, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: lists as parameters, Dan Machak | Thread | Re: lists as parameters, jmbolles |
Re: table of contents, David Carlisle | Date | Re: table of contents, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |