Subject: Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> problem From: "Richard Lander" <rlander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:54:01 -0400 |
> > The first line is no problem (<xsl:pi name="xml">version="1.0"</xsl:pi>) > > actually it _should_ be a problem as the xml declaration isn't a pi > (according to the xml spec) and pi target names are not allowed to start > with `xml' (production 17 of the XML spec). Although, it certainly is nice that it does work, so that we can declare the nature of XML documents. I am surprised that there isn't some formal XSLT structure or even a workaround, outside of the non-xml namespace, for producing XML or document type declarations. They seem rather important to me. Richard XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> problem, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> problem, Keith Visco |
HELP! XT is putting namespaces in o, Maxime Levesque | Date | Re: msxml xsl import, Mark Puckett |
Month |