Subject: RE: XT and HTML conversion From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:13:37 -0500 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > > The XSL specification does not deal with the > generation of text streams: XML or otherwise. Therefore there is no > normative stream "output". The only normative output is a tree. In fact, shouldn't the 'tree' format be formally specified? Until the XML property set and/or grove specs have been written, isn't the 'tree' in formal limbo? \ Is it more correct to describe the normative output as a grove? Jonathan Borden http://jabr.ne.mediaone.ne XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Transformation output (was Re: XT a, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | is it just me?, Mark D. Anderson |
RE: Meta XSL, Jonathan Borden | Date | Re: Meta XSL, James Clark |
Month |