Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 12:12:35 +0200 |
Daniel GLAZMAN <daniel.glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah... So why does XSL reinvent the wheel and not reuse CSS > selectors' syntax ? Why those ugly xsl:then and BLA $eq$ "sdfv" ? > Why position qualifiers using negative integers in order to say 'last > one' ? Berk !!!! Because CSS syntax is not XML. I think that the XSL syntax is reasonable given the XML constraint. While not as nice as a dedicated syntax (such as CSS), being an XML language gives it other advantages. Oren Ben-Kiki. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Daniel Glazman | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Daniel GLAZMAN |
Re: syntax feedback, Daniel GLAZMAN | Date | Re: syntax feedback, Daniel GLAZMAN |
Month |