Subject: Re: Advice needed on placement of datatype validation methods From: "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:39:13 +0100 |
Amit Rekhi wrote: >Which of the 2 approaches is better? Depends on your timeframe. The notation approach is going to be maintainable longer if you were to use a name without an type extension, or to associate a PUBLIC name with the notation rather than a system specific one (remember you can use PUBLIC on its own for notations). The question you have to ask is "Will I still be using JScript/VBScript/... when the data comes to the end of its referenceable life". If the answer is No or "Maybe not" then you should stick to notations. Martin Bryan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Advice needed on placement of datat, Amit Rekhi | Thread | Outputing SGML DOCTYPE in Prolog to, Vyse, Jonathan |
Re: CSS for transformation, Philippe Le Hégaret | Date | Attribute Handling, Christian Lindig |
Month |