Subject: Re: `High-level' format specifications with XSL? From: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 09 Jul 1998 12:45:48 +0200 |
>>>>> "Kent Fitch" <kent.fitch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sorry - the XSL I just posted assumes a "wrapper" element around > the <project> and hence won't produce what you want as is - MSXSL > has a quirk which means it insists on just one root object, so I > am accustomed to always enclosing the input document with > <xml>...</xml> (or any other tag pair such as <doc>...</doc>. If I'm not mistaken, that's not a `quirk'. It's a consequence of the XML standard. (At least in SGML, a document is exactly one element (possibly preceded by an SGML declaration and stuff), so I presume that this rule carries over to XML as well.) > In this specific case, you could merge the "project" processing > into the xsl root rule or you could add a wrapper element and > leave the xsl unchanged. My `wrapper' element is `project'. Sadly, I can't use MSXSL as I don't have Windows. kai -- You ate somebody? -- Just a leg. -- That's terrible! -- Not with mustard. (Terry Pratchett: Interesting Times) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: `High-level' format specificati, Kent Fitch | Thread | Re: `High-level' format specificati, Paul Grosso |
Re: `High-level' format specificati, Kai Grossjohann | Date | transformations: xml->html works, w, Wilson, James.W |
Month |