Subject: RE: Scheme Programming Reference From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 19:55:19 -0400 |
Hi Peter, Peter said: I totally agree. The sections on scheme, the transformation and style language as well as the concept flow object are quite clear and nice to read. But section 9.6 on the property set of DSSSL is horrible. I find this section very very hard to read. This is surprising since this particular section is on what a grove is and how it is organised into classes, elements, nodes, etc. In my opinion this section is the most important section of DSSSL, for all remaining sections build on the concept of a grove. Speaking for myself, I find DSSSL is very rich and not too difficult. Both the Scheme part and Flow Object part are rather easy to learn. The part of DSSSL which took a very long time to get a hold on, is the part on groves and the property set. Didier says: Is a text on groves and property set be something to include in the OpenJade home page? Paul Prescod wrote something on this. I could include it on the page. ref: http://www.prescod.net/groves/shorttut/ Groves are part of my knowledge specialty, I worked in a research center several years on stuff based on the whole-part paradigm, so grovse are for me known territories (and how they relate to other whole-part structures like for instance directory services). If I write a text on groves, would this be useful? What kind of information do you expect to get. Or said differently, what do you want to know about groves? regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Scheme Programming Reference, Pieter Rijken | Thread | RE: Scheme Programming Reference, Linda van den Brink |
RE: Scheme Programming Reference, Didier PH Martin | Date | RE: Scheme Programming Reference, Linda van den Brink |
Month |